Thing is, Kelly probably did not pay for that bag. It was probably a "gift". LV will probably get plenty of sales from wannabes that see her carrying it around!

Reply

You know, back home, where i come from, we use them as grocery shopping bags and they cost about $1-$3.

Reply

You know, back home, where i come from, we use them as grocery shopping bags and they cost about $1-$3.

Reply

Every time I see Kelly Osborne, I wonder if she regrets getting those hideous tatoos.

Reply

To each his/her own!!
That's what makes it all very interesting.

Reply

The bag lady down the street has the same bag sanz the Vouitton thing, she keeps hers full of empty cans.

Reply

I've personally never liked LV bags and have never fathomed why some women love them. On the other hand I think this new one isn't half bad, I wouldn't pay more than $5 for it but it's the first LV I've seen that I didn't have the gut reaction of "ugh" to.

Reply

Mine cost ninety-nine cents. No LV of course.

Reply

Louis Vuitton is not the leader in overpriced handbags, that's just silly. They never go out of style and they wear well, so you wind up keeping them much longer than a regular bag and therefore get to amortize the cost over the life of the bag.

Reply

That one is nowhere near as bad as that pieced together craptastic bag Bouncy has been carrying. It's some limited edition, 50K joke Marc Jacobs or some designer there with a sense of humor put together.

Reply

you can get this same bag in Mexico for 2 bucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

We do carry those as market bags in Belgium and they cost about 2 euro a pop, without the signature LV.

Reply

the poster in regard to her getting the bag free is most definitely correct...the poster who said that she is certainly ruining herself, by getting all those dark tatoos is certainly correct...she is starting to look like her dad (who i love after watching the osbournes)...as they say, apples don't fall far from trees...oh...i really love the bag and the price makes it even more desirable...as everything is relative, it depends on your finances, but again, those who can most afford it, get it for free LOL!

Reply

Even if it were a gift, that thing shouldn't be seen in public. Even if it weren't ugly, prices like the one quoted in the article are just rediculous. Take $2,400 to K-Mart or Wal-Mart and you could buy a whole wardroobe, not just one ugly bag.

Reply

they? What?

Reply

Oh good grief...it isn't a regular handbag...it's a daytripper. You know...or overnighter. ANNNNNND for that purpose...I like it

Reply

it's a hideous bag, I saw a little old lady carrying it in the supermarket.
2400! You got to be kidding me, she has no taste whatsoever.

Yuk!!!

Reply

If you got it flant it, but don't flant it with that ugly a_ _ bag. There is nothing that any of Ozzies kids need to flant except his oldest daughter, ( the one with sense and good looking one) that can flant anything. So please keep these other two pitiful kids out of the headlines.

Reply

she has an eating problem. kelly, keep you chubby fingers out of the cookie jar!

Reply

Those are tattoos???? Why do people do that to themselves?
As for the bag: plaid????? Why does LV put out such ugly stuff? Well, at least it is better looking than the bag that is the color of baby poop.
-author of the book The Vampire Tom Bartek

Reply